000			02836cam a22004217i 4500
001			19694972
003			OSt
005			20240906132632.0
008			170607t20162016mnu b 001 0 eng d
010			_a 2016461730
020			_a1506401961 _q(pbk. ; _qalk. paper)
020			_a9781506401966 _q(pbk. ; _qalk. paper)
035			_a(OCoLC)ocn933438396
040			_aYDXCP _beng _cYDXCP _erda _dBTCTA _dOCLCQ _dCDX _dIDK _dOCLCO _dLNT _dOCLCQ _dDLC
042			_alccopycat
050	0	0	_aBT265.3.F565 2016 _b14679
082	0	0	_a234/.5 _223
100	1		_aFinlan, Stephen, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aSacrifice and atonement : _bpsychological motives and biblical patterns / _cStephen Finlan.
264		1	_aMinneapolis : _bFortress Press, _c[2016]
264		4	_c©2016
300			_axx, 234 pages ; _c23 cm
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 191-209) and indexes.
505	0		_aIntroduction -- Atonement as purification -- Atonement as compensation or reciprocity -- Attachment, cruelty, and coping -- Rescue and disgust in Paul -- Answers to atonement -- Fear and loathing in the Epistle to the Hebrews -- Atonement played out -- Conclusion.
520			_a"Beneath the commonplace affirmation that Jesus 'paid for our sins' lie depths of implication: Did God demand a blood sacrifice to assuage divine anger? Is sacrifice (consciously or unconsciously) intended to induce the deity to show favor? What underlies the various metaphors for atonement used in the Bible? Here, Stephen Finlan surveys psychological theories that help us to understand beliefs about sacrifice and atonement and what they may reveal about patterns of injury, guilt, shame, and appeasement. Early chapters examine the language in both testaments of purity and the 'scapegoat, ' and of payment, obligation, reciprocity, and redemption. Later chapters review theories of the origins of atonement thinking in fear and traumatic childhood experience, in ambivalent or avoidant attachment to the parents, and in 'poisonous pedagogy.' The theories of Sandor Rado, Mary Ainsworth, Erik Erikson, and Alice Miller are examined, then Finlan draws conclusions about the moral responsibility of appropriating or rejecting atonement metaphors. His arguments bear careful consideration by all who live with these metaphors and their effects today."--Publisher's description.
650		0	_aAtonement.
650		0	_aAtonement _xPsychology.
650		0	_aAtonement _xBiblical teaching.
650		0	_aSacrifice.
650		0	_aSacrifice _xPsychology.
650		0	_aSacrifice _xBiblical teaching.
906			_a7 _bcbc _ccopycat _d2 _encip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2lcc _cBK
999			_c11803 _d11803